Become a design partner

Withdrawal orchestration + evidence

A withdrawal is a workflow, not a database flag.

Evidely is being designed to translate one consent withdrawal into a traceable plan across every configured system—then keep the receipts needed to reconstruct the case.

Explore a design-partner fit
Intakesource + purpose
ExecuteAPI + owner
Verifyreceipt + state
Evidenceplanned signed manifest
What

A developer-first Consent Withdrawal Orchestration and Evidence API.

Why

Withdrawing consent rarely reaches every downstream system reliably. Proving what happened across those systems is even harder.

How

Planned flow: intake → system map → execution → state tracking → verification → evidence export.

Interactive target-architecture explorer

Follow the case, not a feature grid.

These five planned stages cover the eight areas in the v0 hypothesis. Choose a stage to inspect the target controls and artefacts; they are not shipped capabilities.

Receive

What was withdrawn, under which notice?

Accept a source-authenticated request, bind it to the right purpose and notice version, and deduplicate it before work begins.

outputwd_01J2 · purpose/analytics · notice/v4
MVP area

Purpose and notice context

Keep a minimal, versioned record of the processing purpose, notice version, and customer application involved.

  • Purpose and notice versions travel with the case.
  • The affected customer application is explicit.
  • Changes remain traceable instead of overwriting history.
Target output: versioned purpose record
MVP area

Withdrawal intake

Receive a withdrawal through REST, signed webhook, or a controlled sandbox action without collecting identity data just to move the case.

  • Tenant-generated idempotency keys stop duplicate cases.
  • Opaque or pseudonymous subject references minimise data exposure.
  • Signed webhook intake preserves source context.
Target output: accepted withdrawal case

Illustrative target state model

Acknowledged is not the same as verified.

Advance a planned case model along its principal path, or inspect what failure, retained-with-basis, and human-review branches are intended to record.

Selected statePending

The request is valid and waiting for its system plan.

Latest evidence eventintake.accepted · idempotency key bound
Evidence events1
  1. 01intake.accepted · idempotency key bound
Exception branches

Connector direction

Meet the systems where processing happens.

Representative targets we are evaluating with design partners—not a confirmed or generally available integration list.

Representative systems: Salesforce, Zendesk, HubSpot, Freshdesk, Slack, AWS, Google Cloud, PostgreSQL, Custom webhook.

Product names and marks belong to their respective owners. Their appearance does not imply a partnership or endorsement.

Scope boundary

Precision is part of the product.

The initial hypothesis is intentionally smaller than a privacy programme suite. These capabilities should not be read as shipped or included in the first MVP.

  • A registered Consent Manager
  • A cookie banner or consent-capture UI
  • A full DSAR, breach, DPIA, or GRC suite
  • An AI system that decides whether a customer is compliant
Design-partner programme

Help define the workflow before it hardens.

We are looking for Indian B2B SaaS teams willing to pressure-test consent-withdrawal orchestration against real systems and operational constraints.

Become a design partner